AI Through Their Eyes

Hover to explore dilemmas, click for case studies.

AI & People: Why Nonprofits Must Lead the Human Side of AI Adoption

AI is already reshaping organizations, but true success isn’t just about using AI—it’s about how people understand, adapt to, and lead AI-driven change in a way that strengthens, rather than replaces, human capacity.

🚀 AI is Not Just a Tool—It’s a Leadership Challenge

AI in nonprofits isn’t about automation for the sake of efficiency—it’s about making mission-driven work more impactful, strategic, and sustainable.

  • ✅ AI can enhance your team’s capabilities—but only if people understand how to use it.
  • ✅ AI reshapes roles, requiring leaders to foster trust, transparency, and responsibility.
  • ✅ AI can increase inclusion—but only when guided by ethical awareness and accessibility.

💡 Three Truths About AI & People in Nonprofits

1️⃣ AI Won’t Replace People, But It Will Change the Way We Work

The real shift isn’t about machines taking over—it’s about reshaping human effort so that people spend less time on repetitive tasks and more on high-impact mission work.

2️⃣ AI is Only as Ethical as the People Who Guide It

AI can accelerate work—but it can’t make ethical decisions. It can analyze data—but it can’t replace human context. AI can personalize outreach—but it can’t replace relationships.

3️⃣ AI Success Depends on an Adaptive, Learning Culture

The most AI-ready organizations aren’t the most tech-savvy—they’re the ones where leaders, staff, and stakeholders embrace learning, testing, and evolving AI into their work.

🤝 The People Imperative: Leadership, Trust & Inclusion

  • 🔹 Leadership: AI adoption isn’t just an IT decision—it’s a leadership challenge that demands accountability.
  • 🔹 Trust: AI should increase transparency, not erode it. People must be part of shaping AI’s role.
  • 🔹 Inclusion: AI should reduce bias, not reinforce it. The best AI strategies include diverse perspectives.

📌 The Next Step: Preparing Your People for AI

What if your team had a clear, ethical, and practical roadmap for AI adoption?

  • ➡️ Assess your team’s AI readiness—what do they know? What are their concerns?
  • ➡️ Train your staff not just on AI tools, but on AI ethics & decision-making.
  • ➡️ Engage donors, volunteers, and communities—AI is about people, not just technology.
Can AI truly enhance human work, or does it just change what “work” means?
How do we ensure AI supports, rather than replaces, human expertise?
What happens when AI decisions impact real lives—and it gets it wrong?
Who is responsible when AI makes a biased or unfair decision?
Can AI ever really understand human emotions, or is it just simulating them?
How do we balance AI efficiency with the human need for connection?
If AI speeds up work, does it also speed up burnout?
How do we make sure AI benefits everyone—not just those who can afford it?
Can AI-generated stories be as powerful as human ones?
What does “fair” look like in AI-driven hiring and decision-making?
Who is accountable when AI makes a mistake? The developer? The user? The organization?
Will AI change what leadership means?
How do we prepare teams for AI changes without overwhelming them?
What happens when AI recommendations conflict with human judgment?
Should donors know if an AI helped write their fundraising appeal?
How do we protect creativity in an AI-driven world?
Does AI make decision-making better, or just faster?
Can AI ever be truly neutral?
Are we asking AI to do too much—or not enough?
What skills will people need in a world where AI does the “thinking”?
Is AI making us better at our jobs—or just faster at them?
What does ethical AI actually look like in practice?
How do we make AI training more inclusive and accessible?
If AI handles the “easy” work, does that mean humans only get the hard stuff?
Who is AI leaving behind?
Can AI amplify bias even when we try to remove it?
Should people always be able to override AI decisions?
How do we make sure AI enhances dignity rather than erodes it?
What new power dynamics emerge when AI is involved in decision-making?
How do we ensure AI reflects diverse voices and perspectives?
Is it ethical to use AI to persuade someone to donate?
Should AI ever be used to simulate real people’s voices or writing?
How do we set ethical guardrails when AI evolves faster than policy?
Are we designing AI to make the right decisions—or just the profitable ones?
Can an AI-driven process still be mission-driven?
Should AI be allowed to “guess” about human needs?
When AI recommends something, how do we know we can trust it?
Can AI actually help people be more ethical—or does it just automate existing flaws?
How do we make sure AI doesn’t unintentionally exclude people?
Is AI making organizations more human-centered—or less?
Can AI make good leadership decisions, or is that something only people can do?
How do we measure success when AI is involved?
Is AI a tool, a teammate, or something else entirely?
How do we prevent AI from reinforcing privilege?
If AI “learns” from the past, how do we ensure it doesn’t repeat old mistakes?
Should AI ever make decisions without human review?
How do we explain AI decisions to people who don’t understand the technology?
What happens when AI replaces a job that gave someone meaning?
Can AI-driven insights ever replace lived experience?
Are we thinking critically enough about the AI we’re putting into the world?